InvestorsObserver gives VeChain a strong long-term technical score of 79 from its research. The proprietary scoring system take into account the historical trading patterns from recent months to a year of the coin’s support and resistance levels, in addition to where it is relative to long-term averages. The analysis helps to determine whether it’s a strong buy-and-hold investment opportunity currently for traders.
VET at this time has a superior long-term technical analysis score than 79% of crytpos in circulation. The Long-Term Rank will be most relevant to buy-and-hold type investors who are looking for strong steady growth when allocating their assets. Combining a high long and short-term technical score will also help portfolio managers discover coins that have bottomed out.
The current trading price of $0.027345168 for VET is -$0.0211095 (-43.57%) below the coins 100-day moving average of $0.048454703. VET meanwhile is $0.0032235 (-45488.75%) above its 52-week low of $0.024121687 and -$0.16016584 (-5318.44%) under its 52-week high price of $0.187511012. VeChain’s current price relative to the coins long-term average and 52-week high and low, gives the crypto a strong long-term technical score of 79. The price movement and range of VET suggest that investors are neutral on the coin at this time.
VeChain has a market capitalization of $1,982,829,468.48 and a relatively high average daily volume with $1,075,488,273.52 worth of the currency traded over the typical 24 hour period. Over the last 24 hours, VET’s volume is below its seven day average with 153,153,662.80 exchanged.
Technical analysis of VeChain over the past year results in the crypto receiving a a strong long-term technical score of 79 as its price movement in that time has given traders reason to be neutral on the coin in the long-term.
Click Here to get the full Report on VeChain (VET).
Stay In The Know
Subscribe to our daily morning update newsletter and never miss out on the need-to-know market news, movements, and more.
This news is republished from another source. You can check the original article here