
VanEck is due to list a low-cost bitcoin futures exchange-traded fund in the US after the Securities and Exchange Commission rejected the issuer’s application for a spot bitcoin ETF.
The rejection came despite the SEC approving ETFs in bitcoin futures contracts listed on CME Group in October.
VanEck said in a statement that it is due to launch the VanEck Bitcoin Strategy ETF, an actively managed ETF that invests in standardized cash-settled bitcoin futures, on 16 September.
We’re excited to list the @vaneck_us Bitcoin Strategy ETF (XBTF) tomorrow. Learn more at https://t.co/8M8JUutAyh. https://t.co/3A9egjf9ZV
— Cboe (@CBOE) November 15, 2021
“XBTF comes to market as the lowest-cost bitcoin-linked ETF, with a net expense ratio 30 basis points (bps) lower than its next closest competitor,” added VanEck.
The net expense ratio is 0.65%.
The ETF will invest primarily in bitcoin futures listed and traded on the CME Group. VanEck said average daily open interest in the CME’s bitcoin futures has increased from $77m in the first quarter of 2018 to approximately $1.5bn in the third quarter of this year.
Kyle DaCruz, director, digital assets product with VanEck, said in a statement: “While a ‘physically backed’ bitcoin ETF remains a key goal, we are very pleased to be providing investors with this important tool as they build their digital asset portfolios.”
State Street will provide services including ETF basket operations, custody of the ETF shares, fund accounting, order-taking and act as the transfer agent.
Nadine Chakar, State Street Digital
Nadine Chakar, head of State Street Digital, said in a statement: “Our newly launched division, State Street Digital, was created to help drive innovation and address the industry’s evolving shift to digital finance, and we continue to prioritize developing our servicing capabilities as part of our broader strategy for the crypto and digital assets environment. We are pleased to further develop our longstanding partnership with VanEck on this important fund launch.”
The introduction of the VanEck Bitcoin Strategy ETF follows the ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF listing on the NYSE on 19 October, and Valkyrie Funds launching its Bitcoin Strategy ETF on Nasdaq on October 22.
Giang Bui, head of US exchange-traded products at Nasdaq, said in a blog that Valkyrie Investments’s bitcoin futures ETF was a milestone in terms of product innovation.
Recently, @ValkyrieFunds launched the Valkyrie Bitcoin Strategy #ETF $BTF on @Nasdaq.
Giang Bui, Head of U.S. Exchange Traded Products and ETF expert, discusses this milestone in her recent article: https://t.co/ncGD9tlxDT pic.twitter.com/5W3HC0Q5oF
— Nasdaq (@Nasdaq) November 14, 2021
“Kudos to all issuers for developing exciting new ETFs and navigating the regulatory process so investors can diversify their portfolios and save for the future,” Bui added.
She continued that issuers have submitted a number of ETF filings to the SEC, including physically-backed bitcoin and ether products as well as cryptocurrency futures-based products, and the pace has picked up this year.
For example, Victory Capital has filed for a multi-coin ETF tracking the Nasdaq Crypto Index (NCI), Nasdaq’s first digital asset index which launched in February this year. The key components of the NCI include bitcoin, ether, litecoin, chainlink, bitcoin cash, uniswap, stellar lumens and filecoin.
Bui noted that Europe, Dubai and Canada have already launched cryptocurrency ETFs in their markets.
On 1 June VanEck became the first issuer to list its crypto ETPs on the Amsterdam and Paris stock exchanges after they started trading on Deutsche Börse Xetra in Germany last year.
With its five #ETNs (exchange traded notes) on the cryptocurrencies #Bitcoin, #Ethereum, #Solana, #TRON and #Polkadot, VanEck raises half a billion US dollars from investors. Learn more in our press room: https://t.co/mqjuF4kkEY pic.twitter.com/gp6ADYnnZh
— VanEck Europe (@vaneck_eu) October 28, 2021
Spot bitcoin ETFs
The SEC said in an order on 12 November that it disapproved of VanEck’s bitcoin spot ETF because Cboe Global Markets, the proposed listing venue, has not demonstrated that it has a comprehensive surveillance-sharing agreement with a regulated market of significant size related to the underlying or reference bitcoin assets.
The regulator said in the order: “The hallmarks of a surveillance-sharing agreement are that the agreement provides for the sharing of information about market trading activity, clearing activity, and customer identity; that the parties to the agreement have reasonable ability to obtain access to and produce requested information; and that no existing rules, laws, or practices would impede one party to the agreement from obtaining this information from, or producing it to, the other party.”
Joe Saluzzi, partner at institutional agency broker Themis Trading, was unsurprised at the rejection. He said:
How much more of the @SECGov time will these spot bitcoin ETF proposals take? Unless they get a surveillance sharing agreement, stop with these proposals. Maybe the @SECGov should start charging for their time?
— Joe Saluzzi (@JoeSaluzzi) November 12, 2021
Jan van Eck, chief executive of VanEck, expressed his disappointment:
We are disappointed in today’s update from the SEC declining approval of our physical bitcoin ETF. We believe that investors should be able to gain #BTC exposure through a regulated fund and that a non-futures ETF structure is the superior approach. @tyler @gaborgurbacs
— Jan van Eck (@JanvanEck3) November 12, 2021
The Blockchain Association was also disappointed:
2/ VanEck proposed an ETF that would hold actual bitcoin rather than expensive futures contracts that track bitcoin’s price. Most experts believe this type of product is better for investors than the already-approved futures ETFs, because it’s less complex and incurs fewer costs.
— Blockchain Association (@BlockchainAssn) November 12, 2021
4/ Even if the SEC has the law right, it continues to reach the wrong result by holding bitcoin to a higher standard than other commodities like platinum and palladium, which are both SEC-approved for spot ETF listing. There’s no valid reason to treat bitcoin any differently.
— Blockchain Association (@BlockchainAssn) November 12, 2021
5/ Since the SEC has already approved a futures-based bitcoin ETF, we strongly believe it should approve a spot ETF as well. We encourage the SEC to give bitcoin the fair and equal treatment it deserves, and hope future ETF proposals receive their due consideration.
— Blockchain Association (@BlockchainAssn) November 12, 2021
Patrick Heusser, head of trading at Switzerland-based Crypto Finance (Brokerage), said in a blog: “My personal take is this: strong lobbying forces are flexing their muscles.”
“I cannot see a reasonable explanation why a Bitcoin Futures ETF was approved, but not a spot one.” In today’s #MarketOpening, our Head of Trading @heussepa gives his take on the SEC’s rejection of VanEck’s Bitcoin ETF. https://t.co/0H6w5axbiU… #bitcoinnews #ETF
— Crypto Finance (@CryptoFinanceAG) November 15, 2021
Heusser added. “If the SEC at some point approves a spot Bitcoin ETF, all those naysayers will need to backpedal hard and start trying to explain to their clients why they were unable to participate in one of the largest wealth accumulation assets.”
This news is republished from another source. You can check the original article here
Be the first to comment